darwin.

Supplements with real evidence

The supplement industry is an ocean of promises. A few products have solid evidence. Most do not. This is the honest list.

Creatine tub with powder and a scoop on a dark surface
Photo: Unsplash
2 to 3% Average gain in endurance time trials with caffeine at 3 to 6 mg/kg Southward 2018
3 to 5 g/day Creatine maintenance dose after muscle saturation ISSN Kreider 2017
56% Pooled prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in athletes Farrokhyar 2015

Level A: strong evidence

Creatine monohydrate: the most researched supplement in the history of sport. It increases PCr resynthesis, improving performance in explosive efforts and short-duration strength work. 3 to 5 g/day is enough. Safe for healthy adults.

Caffeine: 3 to 6 mg/kg, 30 to 60 minutes before exercise. It reduces perceived effort, improves alertness and can increase endurance and strength performance by 1 to 3%. Tolerance builds with continuous use. One or two "caffeine holidays" per week preserve the ergogenic effect.

Beta-alanine: buffers lactic acid in the muscles during efforts of 1 to 4 minutes. Dose: 3.2 to 6.4 g/day, split up to reduce the tingling (paresthesia), a common and harmless side effect.

Level B: moderate evidence

Nitrate (beetroot juice): converts into nitric oxide in the body, reducing the oxygen cost of exercise. The effect is more pronounced in recreational athletes than in elite athletes. Dose: ~500 ml of concentrated beetroot juice, 2 to 3 h before the race.

Vitamin D: deficiency (below 30 ng/mL) is associated with a higher risk of stress injuries and immunosuppression. Athletes who train indoors or live at high latitudes have a higher prevalence of deficiency. Dosage based on a blood test.

Level C or no evidence

BCAAs, HMB, glutamine, L-carnitine, CLA and the vast majority of thermogenic "fat burners" have no convincing evidence of benefit for athletes who already consume adequate protein. The money spent on these products would be better invested in quality food.

The starting point for reading supplement evidence is the ABCD framework of the Australian Institute of Sport (AIS), also aligned with the IOC. Group A (strong evidence for specific situations) holds the few ergogenics with solid backing: caffeine, creatine, beta-alanine, dietary nitrate, sodium bicarbonate and glycerol, plus sports foods and some medical supplements such as iron and vitamin D. If a product does not appear in that group, skepticism is the most honest stance.

Creatine monohydrate is the most studied supplement in the category, with more than a thousand papers published since the 1990s according to the ISSN position stand (Kreider, 2017). The suggested maintenance dose is 3 to 5 g per day after muscle saturation. The effect is consistent in short, intense efforts and in strength, not in long-duration endurance.

Caffeine came off the WADA prohibited list in 2004 and became the most used legal ergogenic aid in elite sport. The meta-analysis by Southward (2018) estimated an average improvement of about 2 to 3% in time trial time with doses of 3 to 6 mg/kg taken about an hour before. Nitrate from beetroot juice, in turn, reduces the oxygen cost of submaximal effort by around 3 to 5% (same VO2 per watt), and vitamin D is worth monitoring because the pooled prevalence of insufficiency reaches 56% among athletes (Farrokhyar, 2015), with a documented impact on bone health.

Supplementation should be discussed with a physician or sports dietitian. Competition athletes: check that the product carries anti-doping certification (Informed Sport, NSF).

The takeaway

The ABCD framework of the Australian Institute of Sport does a good job of separating the wheat from the chaff: of the hundreds of products sold as ergogenics, only caffeine, creatine, beta-alanine, nitrate, sodium bicarbonate, glycerol, iron and vitamin D have real backing, Group A. Everything else (BCAA, HMB, glutamine, L-carnitine, CLA, the trendy thermogenics) lives in Group C, with no evidence to justify the price. Creatine alone has accumulated more than a thousand studies since the 1990s and remains the most studied supplement in sport, with 3 to 5 g/day being enough to maintain the effect. Before opening your wallet for the next nicely labeled tub, it is worth asking: is this product in Group A, or only in the advertising? The right answer saves money and sometimes saves you a positive anti-doping test.

Who proves it in practice

Eliud Kipchoge Marathon runner, Kenya

At the INEOS 1:59 Challenge (Vienna, October 12, 2019) he ran 1:59:40 on a nutrition plan based on Maurten products, including caffeinated gels (Gel 100 Caf, 100 mg of caffeine each), refueling every 5 km to target 60 to 100 g of carbohydrate per hour.

Belgian rowers (Baguet 2010 study) Elite rowers, Belgium

In the study by Baguet and colleagues (2010, Journal of Applied Physiology), 18 elite Belgian rowers took 5 g/day of beta-alanine for 7 weeks: the supplemented group finished the 2000 m about 4.3 s faster than the placebo group, with a 45.3% increase in carnosine in the soleus.

Athletes from track and field World Championships (Tscholl 2010) Elite athletes, world

In the analysis by Tscholl and colleagues (2010, American Journal of Sports Medicine), covering 3887 doping control forms from track and field World Championships, 66.8% of the declared items were nutritional supplements, showing widespread use of vitamins, creatine, caffeine and amino acids.

Answers about the topic

Frequently asked questions

Supplements

Which supplements actually have scientific evidence?

The strongest evidence points to creatine, caffeine, protein powder (whey or plant-based), beta-alanine and nitrate (beetroot juice) in specific training contexts. These are the few that show up consistently in reviews and in the position stands of organizations such as the International Olympic Committee. The vast majority of products sold as 'enhancers' have no robust backing.

Does creatine really work? What dose do the studies use?

Yes, creatine monohydrate is one of the most studied supplements, and the evidence points to strength and power gains in high-intensity training. Studies usually use about 3 to 5 g per day on a continuous basis, with no mandatory loading phase. It is considered safe for healthy people, although anyone with a kidney condition should talk to a professional first.

Do I need whey protein to gain muscle mass?

Not necessarily. What the evidence suggests is that hitting your daily protein target matters more than the source, and reviews point to something around ~1.6 g per kilogram of body weight per day for people who do strength training. Whey is just a practical way to fill that gap when food is not enough, but foods like eggs, meat, dairy and legumes serve the same purpose.

How much caffeine should I take before training, according to science?

The evidence points to improved performance and perceived effort with doses of approximately 3 to 6 mg per kilogram of body weight, taken about 30 to 60 minutes before exercise. Doses far above that bring no extra benefit and increase effects such as insomnia and a racing heart. The response varies quite a bit from person to person, so it is worth testing the lowest effective dose.

References

  1. Kreider RB et al. (2017). International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14:18.
  2. Maughan RJ et al. (2018). IOC consensus statement: dietary supplements and the high-performance athlete. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(7):439-455.
  3. Southward K, Rutherfurd-Markwick KJ, Ali A (2018). The Effect of Acute Caffeine Ingestion on Endurance Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Medicine, 48(8):1913-1928.
  4. Baguet A et al. (2010). Important role of muscle carnosine in rowing performance. Journal of Applied Physiology, 109(4):1096-1101.
  5. Farrokhyar F et al. (2015). Prevalence of vitamin D inadequacy in athletes: a systematic-review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 45(3):365-378.
  6. Tscholl P et al. (2010). The use of drugs and nutritional supplements in top-level track and field athletes. American Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(1):133-140.

Educational content. It does not replace a consultation with a dietitian or a physician. An individualized meal plan is an act reserved to licensed dietitians under Brazilian law (Lei 8.234/91). Sources are cited with a link for verification. Images under the Unsplash License (free use, including commercial).